skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 183219 Find in a Library
Title: Problems with the DSM-IV Diagnosis of Pedophilia
Journal: Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment  Volume:12  Issue:2  Dated:April 2000  Pages:95-105
Author(s): William O'Donohue; Lisa G. Regev; Anne Hagstrom
Date Published: April 2000
Page Count: 11
Publisher: http://www.kluweronline.com/issn/1079-0632/contents 
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper examines the taxonomic adequacy of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th Edition, DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) diagnostic category of pedophilia.
Abstract: This diagnosis, as well as the other sexual disorders, have been ignored in DSM field trials. There is no empirical information about the reliability or validity of this diagnosis. Because of the vagueness of the diagnostic criteria, clinicians would need to make inferences that would likely lead to reliability problems in diagnosis. Further, the DSM diagnostic criteria include constructs that are not intersubjectively verifiable and for which there are no valid measures. This can also lead to lack of diagnostic reliability and accuracy. Most problematic, however, are aspects of the diagnostic criteria, most notably the presence of an “ego dystonic sexual attraction to children,” that are incorrect exclusion criteria. The paper argues for modified and more refined diagnostic criteria to assess for pedophilia. It suggests changes to several criteria in the DSM-IV, more specific definitions of the words “recurrent” and “behavior,” a justification for the minimal temporal period of 6 months and addition of assessment tools aside from the self-report. References
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Child molesters; Child Sexual Abuse; Instrument validation; Juvenile victims; Psychological evaluation; Self evaluation; Sex offenders; Sex offenses; Testing and measurement
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=183219

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.