skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 183417 Find in a Library
Title: Vanderbilt Law Review
Journal: Vanderbilt Law Review  Volume:53  Issue:3  Dated:April 2000  Pages:749-1054
Editor(s): John Frederick Preis
Date Published: April 2000
Page Count: 306
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: These six articles focus on the doctrine of shareholder oppression in minority stockholders in close corporations, drug courts, judicial decisions related to bankruptcy, the liability of securities issuers for misstatements by third parties, avoidance of the appearance of judicial bias in Federal courts, and law related to work for hire.
Abstract: The analysis of shareholder oppression concludes that courts and commentators have not fully considered the differences between the majority and minority perspectives of shareholder oppression and that the choice of perspective is crucial outside the context of the typical freeze-out scenario. The analysis of drug courts have an experimentalist architecture that suggests that these courts and similar institutions need not experience a strict tradeoff between effectiveness and accountability. The analysis of bankruptcy cases subsequently overruled cases concludes that textualism disproportionately leads to bad decisions that result in costly, time-consuming, and inefficient statutory overrulings. Other papers recommend that courts establish a practical bright-line standard related to statements about new securities and argue that criminal defendants who have entered unconditional guilty pleas following a denial of a motion to recuse should be able to appeal the recusal decision. The final paper argues that courts should not consider sound recordings to be works for hire. Footnotes
Main Term(s): Appellate court decisions
Index Term(s): Bankruptcy fraud; Civil litigation; Conflict of interest; Contractual disputes; Corporate self-regulation; Drug Courts; Federal courts; Judicial attitudes; Professional conduct and ethics; Regulations compliance; Securities fraud
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=183417

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.