skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 183648 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Analysis of Police Use-of-Force Data
Author(s): Geoffrey P. Alpert; Roger G. Dunham
Date Published: January 1998
Page Count: 81
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Grant Number: 95-IJ-CX-0104
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report first reviews what is currently known about police use of force and then presents relevant information that was collected from the Metro-Dade Police Department in Miami and from the sister cities of Eugene and Springfield, Ore.
Abstract: Prior research on police use of force has focused on the most force used or the highest level reached in an encounter. The current analysis differs from previous research in that it addresses the level of force used by the police relative to the suspect's level of resistance, which this study calls the "force factor." The force factor is calculated by measuring both the suspect's level of resistance and the officer's level of force, scaled in the same manner. Suspect level of resistance was measured in four ordinal categories: no resistance, slight resistance, moderate or high resistance, and violent or explosive resistance. Corresponding levels of force were no force, slight force, forcibly subdued suspect with hands, and forcibly subdued the suspect using methods other than hands. To calculate the force factor, the level of resistance was subtracted from the level of police force. A zero score was interpreted as commensurate force for the level of resistance. The Metro-Dade distribution was skewed slightly to the negative side, indicating that, on the average, the level of police force used was slightly lower than the level of resistance. On the other hand, the Oregon distribution was skewed slightly to the positive side, indicating that, on the average, the level of police force used was slightly higher than the level of resistance. These findings correlate with the training emphases of the departments. Metro-Dade officers are trained to choose a level of force slightly under the level of resistance; whereas, the Eugene and Springfield officers are trained to choose a level of force slightly higher than the level of resistance. Implications are drawn for policy and training. 20 tables, 2 figures, and 52 references
Main Term(s): Police use of deadly force
Index Term(s): Florida; Lawful use of force; NIJ final report; Oregon; Police policies and procedures; Resisting arrest
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.