skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 183881 Find in a Library
Title: Flight as Justification for Seizure: Supreme Court Rulings
Journal: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin  Volume:69  Issue:6  Dated:June 2000  Pages:28-32
Author(s): Michael E. Brooks J.D.
Date Published: June 2000
Page Count: 5
Sponsoring Agency: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: HTML
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. Wardlow in 2000 provides both guidance and additional questions for police officers seeking to understand what facts are sufficient to constitute the reasonable suspicion necessary to detain someone temporarily and whether an individual’s flight can justify pursuit and detention.
Abstract: The case involved a suspected drug offender who fled when he noticed police officers. The officers who chased and caught him, conducted a frisk for weapons--experience had taught them that weapons were often present near narcotics transactions--and found a loaded handgun. The police arrested Wardlow for a weapons violation. Wardlow argued that his detention and the subsequent frisk were unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. The trial court held that the officer’s actions were a lawful stop and frisk. Two Illinois appeals courts reversed. The United States Supreme Court reversed these decisions and held that unexplained flight upon noticing the police is a pertinent factor in determining whether reasonable suspicion exists. The Court’s decision suggests the need for police administrators to continue to evaluate their policies concerning what actions are appropriate when an individual flees upon the approach of a police officer. They must instruct officers to note all pertinent facts observed both before and during any chase. These facts are essential to support a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity necessary to justify a temporary investigative detention. Photographs and reference notes
Main Term(s): Police legal limitations
Index Term(s): Arrest and apprehension; Detention; Escape; Fleeing felons; Fresh pursuit; Manhunt; Police discretion; Reasonable suspicion; Stop and frisk; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.