skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 184026     Find in a Library
  Title: Assessing the Effectiveness of Juvenile Justice Reforms: A Closer Look at the Criteria and the Impacts on Diverse Stakeholders
  Author(s): Daniel P. Mears
  Journal: Law and Policy  Volume:22  Issue:2  Dated:April 2000  Pages:175 to 202
  Date Published: 04/2000
  Page Count: 28
  Annotation: Drawing on previous research and an analysis of the potential effects of a recent juvenile justice sentencing reform in Texas, this paper argues for greater attention to conceptualizing and empirically assessing effectiveness broadly, including reference to intended and unintended effects, multiple goals and means, and diverse stakeholders.
  Abstract: After reviewing previous research on juvenile justice reforms, the paper provides an outline and discussion of dimensions that are critical to assessing effectiveness. As a preliminary to focusing directly on the potential importance of diverse stakeholders, the author provides a brief overview of the specific juvenile sentencing reform -- determinate sentencing of juveniles in Texas -- that provides the empirical basis for the subsequent analyses. This new, "blended" sentencing statute creates an additional sentencing option in cases that involve certain felony offenses. By affording prosecutors the ability to seek specific sentence lengths that can begin in the juvenile system and be completed in the adult system, a middle ground is created between indeterminate sentencing in the juvenile justice system and transfer to the adult system. The discussion of determinate sentencing is followed by review of the data used, which consist of interviews with juvenile justice practitioners and a survey of juvenile court prosecutors in Texas, as well as previous research on select issues. The analyses and discussion center on three groups of stakeholders: juveniles, practitioners, and the juvenile and criminal justice systems. The author then discusses research and policy implications of the general assessment issues, as well as the more specific focus on diverse stakeholders. The author advises that this paper is illustrative, aimed not at providing a definitive evaluation framework or generalizable findings, but instead at suggesting the potential importance of taking a broader view of effectiveness than generally is done in evaluations of sentencing policies. 4 tables, 13 notes, and 99 references
  Main Term(s): Juvenile sentencing
  Index Term(s): Sentencing reform ; Juvenile Corrections/Detention effectiveness ; Texas
  Publisher URL: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-8240&site=1 
  Type: Report (Study/Research)
  Country: United Kingdom
  Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=184026

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.