skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 184697 Find in a Library
Title: Creating the Judicial Branch: The Unfinished Reform
Author(s): Robert W. Tobin
Date Published: 1999
Page Count: 309
Sponsoring Agency: National Ctr for State Courts
Williamsburg, VA 23185
Publication Number: ISBN 0-89656-200-X
Sale Source: National Ctr for State Courts
State Court Financing Project
300 Newport Avenue
Williamsburg, VA 23185
United States of America
Type: Historical Overview
Format: Book (Softbound)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This book documents and analyzes the changes that have occurred in U.S. State courts since the middle of the 20th century, which has involved a continuing struggle to create the judicial branch of State government.
Abstract: Part I deals with the early history of courts in the United States and the prevalent legalistic approach to judicial independence that ignored the implications of administrative dependence on the other branches of State and local government. Part II discusses the debilitating conditions of State courts in the early part of the 20th century, which sparked demands for reform. The State trial courts lacked the elementary rudiments of a credible judicial system: independence, accountability, integrity, management, and quality. These conditions were largely due to politics in judicial selection, localism run amok, lawyer domination of court processes, and a lack of management orientation among judges. Part III is the story of the reform movement of the late 20th century. This movement had two goals: upgrading the professionalism of the State judiciary and unifying State trial court systems. Part IV assesses the early reform agenda and describes the emerging reform agenda. The new reform issues will change the way courts deal with the public and affect the culture of the judiciary and the legal system. Symbolic of these issues is the responsibility of the judiciary to arrest and reverse the declining professionalism of the legal profession. The adversarial process is in trouble, because it is perceived as lacking both integrity and respect for persons. The system stands accused of producing a shoddy form of justice that is divorced from the truth, demeaning to those who participate in the process, and a denial of access to many who might invoke the aid of the legal system. The current system is traumatic for participants, financially costly, lengthy, and unreliable as a means of achieving justice. The underlying premises of the adversarial system are due for re-examination. Chapter footnotes and a subject index
Main Term(s): Court reform
Index Term(s): Court management; Court structure; Judge selection; State court unification; State courts
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.