skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 184738 Find in a Library
Title: Comparison of Four Restorative Conferencing Models
Author(s): Gordon Bazemore; Mark Umbreit
Date Published: February 2001
Page Count: 20
Sponsoring Agency: Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 95-JN-FX-0024
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
P.O. Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: HTML|PDF
Type: Program Description (Model)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This bulletin focuses on four restorative conferencing models: victim-offender mediation, community reparative boards, family group conferencing, and circle sentencing.
Abstract: These models illustrate a new philosophy of citizen and community participation in decisions about how to respond to youth crime. They attempt to strike a balance among the needs of victims, offenders, and the communities so that each is actively involved in the justice process to the greatest extent possible. Each of the four restorative conferencing models, present information on background and concept, procedures and goals, considerations in implementation, lessons learned from research, and sources of additional information. The bulletin continues on comparing and contrasting the models on the following dimensions: origins and current applications, administrative and procedural aspects, and community involvement and other dimensions. The bulletin also offers guidelines for clearly grounding interventions in restorative justice principles and includes a test for determining whether an intervention strengthens the community response to youth crime and creates new roles for citizens and community groups. The models offer significant potential for changing the current dynamic in which the community is largely a passive observer of juvenile justice processes. But, if victims, offenders, and other citizens are to be fully engaged in meaningful decision making processes, a dramatic change must occur in the role of juvenile justice professionals, from that of sole decision-maker to facilitator and resource to the community. References and bibliographies
Main Term(s): Juvenile justice reform
Index Term(s): Community involvement; Juvenile crime control; Models; Victim-offender reconciliation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.