skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 186506 Find in a Library
Title: Is Good-Time Appropriate for Offenders on Electronic Monitoring? Attitudes of Electronic Monitoring Directors
Journal: Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:28  Issue:6  Dated:November/December 2000  Pages:497-506
Author(s): Brian K. Payne; Randy R. Gainey
Editor(s): Kent B. Joscelyn
Date Published: 2000
Page Count: 10
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In June 1997, the Virginia State Crime Commission and the Department of Criminal Justice Services mailed surveys to all sheriffs and jail administrators in Virginia to ask about the existence of an electronic monitoring program in each county and about attitudes toward the use of good time for electronically-monitored offenders.
Abstract: Of 98 surveys mailed, 59 were returned for a response rate of 60.2 percent, and 30 of the 59 respondents said they had an electronic monitoring program. The survey included 23 items focusing on the technology used by the responding agency, the number of offenders in the program, the process of recruiting offenders, the future of electronic monitoring, and the use of good time in electronic monitoring. Most directors of electronic monitoring programs indicated their programs followed written standard operating procedures and most required offenders to pay fees to be on electronic monitoring. In contrast, other measures showed considerable variation in program implementation. Specifically, the number of bracelets owned by the programs, the average number of offenders, and the highest number of offenders at one time varied tremendously across programs. Those supporting good time policies said good time credits should be allowed to maintain program success rates. Those opposing good time policies felt electronic monitoring was sufficient and offenders did not need any additional benefits such as good time. The authors conclude good time policies may be useful for electronic monitoring programs in some situations. 40 references, 5 notes, and 3 tables
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Alternatives to institutionalization; Correctional personnel attitudes; Electronic monitoring of offenders; Good time allowance; Jails; Sheriffs; Virginia
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.