skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 192146 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: OJJDP Reporting Requirements for Discretionary and Formula Grantees and Concerns About Evaluation Studies
Corporate Author: US Government Accountability Office
United States of America
Date Published: October 2001
Page Count: 101
Sponsoring Agency: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
US Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20013
US Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548
Publication Number: GAO-02-23
Sale Source: US Government Accountability Office
P.O. Box 37050
Washington, DC 20013
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents the methodology and findings of a review of the U.S. Justice Department's Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention's (OJJDP's) major programs, as well as the evaluations it has funded.
Abstract: Specifically, the study obtained information on programmatic reporting requirements for OJJDP grantees, the reasons for these requirements, and examples of the information grantees have reported, along with information on how many juveniles OJJDP grantees reported directly serving in fiscal year 2000 and whether OJJDP requires grantees to report the number of juveniles they directly serve. Further, the study analyzed the methodological rigor of the impact evaluations OJJDP has funded for its own programs since 1995. A review of OJJDP's major programs found that although virtually all grantees are required to report on their progress twice a year, the information they reported varied. There were eight programs in which all grantees reported the number of juveniles they directly served. These eight programs reported serving approximately 142,000 juveniles in fiscal year 2000. An in-depth review of 10 of OJJDP's impact evaluations undertaken since 1995 raised concerns about whether many of the evaluations would produce definitive results. All of these evaluations are still ongoing. Two of the evaluations that are in their later stages and three of those that are in their formative stages lack specific plans for comparison groups, which would aid in isolating the impacts of the programs from the effects of other factors that may have influenced change. This report recommends that the five evaluations that are in their formative stages ensure that potential problems related to comparison groups and data collection are mitigated. Appendixes contain OJJDP awards data for fiscal years 1996 through 2000; OJJDP's process for disseminating published products; a categorical assistance progress report form; descriptions of OJJDP programs, reporting requirements, and examples of reported information; training and technical assistance and research performance data reported by OJJDP grantees; and information on evaluations funded by OJJDP. 12 tables and 2 figures
Main Term(s): Juvenile justice agencies
Index Term(s): Federal juvenile programs; Grants or contracts; Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP); Program evaluation; Program monitoring
Note: Report to the Honorable Bob Schaffer, House of Representatives; downloaded 11/29/2001.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=192146

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.