skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 192954 Find in a Library
Title: Juvenile Justice on Appeal (From The Changing Borders of Juvenile Justice: Transfer of Adolescents to the Criminal Court, P 181-206, 2000, Jeffrey Fagan and Franklin E. Zimring, eds. -- See NCJ-192949)
Author(s): Lynda E. Frost Clausel; Richard J. Bonnie
Date Published: 2000
Page Count: 26
Sponsoring Agency: University of Chicago Press
Chicago, IL 60637-1496
Sale Source: University of Chicago Press
Publicity Director
5801 Ellis Avenue
4th Floor
Chicago, IL 60637-1496
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Book (Hardbound)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter analyzes appellate review of decisions to transfer juveniles to criminal court under differently configured systems.
Abstract: The transfer statutes interpreted by appellate courts fall into three broad categories. "Judicial waiver" statutes give the juvenile judge responsibility for determining which cases should be transferred to criminal court. In contrast, "legislative exclusion" statutes remove decision-making authority from the juvenile judge by requiring that specified classes of juveniles be tried in criminal court. "Prosecutorial election" statutes explicitly confer on prosecutors the discretion to decide whether to file charges in criminal or juvenile court for cases that involve juveniles above a specified age and/or charged with specified offenses. In focusing on appellate court responses to these different types of statutes, this chapter examines the major themes that have emerged from recent case law and highlights key issues and major trends. The authors note that the appellate tradition in all three modes of transfer decisions has been a passive one. With the advent of more punitive sanctions for offenders in criminal court, some appellate courts have rejected statutory provisions that fail to provide any mechanisms for reviewing discretionary decisions to prosecute juvenile offenders as adults. The chapter concludes that the constitutional jurisprudence that governs the transfer process has reached a critical juncture. The courts may follow a path of protective innovation, insisting on special safeguards before juveniles may be subjected to severe punishment as adults, or they may follow a well-marked path of restraint, acceding to the legislative desire for incapacitation of youthful offenders. Courts must decide whether juveniles are deserving of special protections prior to severe punishment as adults or whether legislatures may shape their system of punishment for youthful offenders without constraint by the courts. 54 references and 45 notes
Main Term(s): Juvenile court waiver
Index Term(s): Appellate court decisions; Appellate courts; Juvenile due process; Juvenile processing; Serious juvenile offenders; State laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.