skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 193098 Find in a Library
Title: Victims: Private Vengeance (From Morality and the Law, P 107-118, 2001, Roslyn Muraskin and Matthew Muraskin, eds. -- See NCJ-193090)
Author(s): Meredith George Eichenberg
Date Published: 2001
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: Prentice Hall Publishing
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Sale Source: Prentice Hall Publishing
Criminal Justice and Police Training
1 Lake Street
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
United States of America
Publisher: http://www.policetrainingstore.com 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Book (Softbound)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter explores the ethical arguments for and against personal revenge by victims for crimes against them and concludes with an ethical analysis of participative retribution, the concept of permitting victims and their families to participate in the justice process.
Abstract: A review of the practice of revenge in an ethical-historic context includes the tracing of the evolution from private vengeance to public justice, the movement from the divine right of God alone to administer justice to the constitutional authority of the state to avenge wrongs against individual citizens, and current perspectives on personal vengeance in modern America. This chapter advises that in order for a compromise to be achieved between private and governmental vengeance, American society must back away from the current overuse of coercive justice. To do this, government must abdicate some of its monopoly on vengeance. Without permitting an unbridled exercise of personal vengeance by crime victims, this can be done by giving individual victims the right to participate in the retributive process within guidelines set by the state. Participative retribution most commonly takes the form of the use of victim impact statements for prosecutorial and administrative decision making. This would include sentencing, parole, and perhaps classification or assignment of inmates within the system. Less common, but becoming more frequent are the practices of permitting victims or their families to address the convicted offender either immediately prior to or after sentencing, as well as allowing the families of murder victims to witness the execution of the murderer of a family member. 16 references
Main Term(s): Victims rights
Index Term(s): Criminal Justice System Response to Victims; Punishment; Victim impact statements; Victim reactions to the Criminal Justice System; Vigilantes; Vigilantism causes
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=193098

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.