skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 193353 Find in a Library
Title: Laws of the State and the State of the Law: The Relationship Between Police and Law (From Policing and the Law, P 1-23, 2002, Jeffrey T. Walker, eds. -- See NCJ-193352)
Author(s): Jeffrey T. Walker
Date Published: 2002
Page Count: 23
Sponsoring Agency: Prentice Hall Publishing
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Sale Source: Prentice Hall Publishing
Criminal Justice and Police Training
1 Lake Street
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
United States of America
Publisher: http://www.policetrainingstore.com 
Type: Historical Overview
Format: Book (Softbound)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In this chapter, the progressive movement by the courts and lawmakers to incorporate the Bill of Rights to the States making it applicable to Federal police agencies is presented, especially as they apply to Supreme Court decisions.
Abstract: Since the beginning of the 20th Century, many changes have occurred within policing in terms of both restrictions placed on officers and restrictions removed from them. Many of the legal restrictions and freedoms placed on the police came from the Supreme Court. In many cases the Supreme Court overturned State or other laws governing police behavior. In this chapter, the changes in restrictions placed on officers are addressed under probable cause and searches and seizures, the exclusionary rule, and Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment issues. Until the Boyd vs. United States decision in 1914, there were few restrictions on what the police could do in terms of searches. The exclusionary rule also placed more and more restrictions on the police in terms of what kind of evidence could be excluded if improperly seized. However, what was reduced was the level of surety that police officers needed to establish probable cause, and the number of instances when reduced probable cause was required for a search steadily increased. When evidence was discovered in a vehicle, there was little that police officers couldn’t do, the restrictions were minimal. Yet, when an offender refused to speak without a lawyer present, the police are powerless in speaking to the offender.
Main Term(s): Police legal limitations
Index Term(s): Arrest and apprehension; Bill of Rights; Exclusionary rule; Investigative powers; Miranda rights; Police discretion; Police responsibilities; Probable cause; Rights of the accused; Search and seizure; Stop and frisk; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=193353

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.