skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 193810 Find in a Library
Title: Case Classification in Community Corrections: A National Survey of the State of the Art, Final Report
Author(s): Dana J. Hubbard M.S.; Lawrence F. Travis III Ph.D.; Edward J. Latessa Ph.D.
Corporate Author: University of Cincinnati
School of Criminal Justice
United States of America
Date Published: February 2001
Page Count: 58
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, OH 45221
Grant Number: 98-IJ-CX-0008
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

University of Cincinnati
School of Criminal Justice
ML 210389
Cincinnati, OH 45221
United States of America
Type: Survey
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents the methodology and findings of a 1998 nationwide survey of probation and parole agencies regarding their case classification procedures, so as to determine the state-of-the-art in case classification in community corrections for adult offenders in the United States.
Abstract: A review of the literature on offender risk and needs assessment technology in probation and parole supervision concludes that there have been few efforts to describe the current case classification procedures in community supervision, although there have been a number of summary reviews of the risk-prediction literature. The 1998 survey conducted for the current research involved all adult probation and parole agencies and a random sample of community corrections service providers in the United States. A total of 385 probation and parole agencies (63.4 percent) and 133 community treatment agencies (26.6 percent) responded. The findings indicate that classification and assessment of offenders is an important and valued aspect of community corrections throughout the United States. The vast majority of agencies used some form of standardized and objective tool to assess offender risks and needs. Most respondents rated the use of these instruments as very important to their work; the larger the agency, the more likely it was to use these instruments. The Wisconsin or some variation was the most widely used tool; however, the Level of Service Inventory (LSI) has gained a significant place in probation and parole assessments for classification, as it was cited as the instrument most likely to be considered for future adoption. Management issues reported included training, the cost of the instrument, and the ease of its use. The Wisconsin instruments in general were reported to be more easily and quickly scored than either the Case Management Classification System (CMC) or LSI, and staff training was not as rigorous or costly. Relatively few of the agencies had validated their instrument on local populations, despite some evidence that they had made modifications to the instruments. Only about one-third of the respondents had automated their classification process. Most agencies reassessed offenders; few assessed responsivity factors; and many did not link assessment to service delivery. Consequently, standardized and objective classification and assessment instruments have not been used to their full potential in community corrections. Suggestions are offered for future research. 14 tables, 35 references, and appended survey questionnaire
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Diagnostic and reception processing; Instrument validation; NIJ final report; Offender classification; Offender reclassification; Probation or parole agencies; Risk management
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS. For the executive summary, see NCJ-193809. ***Document is not currently available from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.