skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 194058 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Measuring What Matters: Assessing Community Police Performance in Philadelphia, Final Report
Author(s): Jack R. Greene; Matthew Hickman; Kristin Henderson; Robert Stokes; William Pelfrey; Alexis Piquero
Corporate Author: Temple University
Ctr for Public Policy
United States of America
Date Published: April 1999
Page Count: 153
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Temple University
Philadelphia, PA 19122
Grant Number: 95-IJ-CX-0084
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Temple University
Ctr for Public Policy
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to assess the impact of Philadelphia's shift to a community-oriented and problem-oriented policing style.
Abstract: The goals of the program were increased visibility of community-policing services in neighborhoods and business settings; greater contact between officers and community residents; improved understanding of community needs and a tailoring of services to meet those needs; reduced fear of victimization and reduced potential for crime; and increased police and community ownership and pride in every neighborhood and business section of Philadelphia. The principal units of analysis were police officers and police beats. The COPS AHEAD Program in Philadelphia provided an opportunity to study the range of roles embodied by police officers, including the "community-oriented generalist," motorized patrol, and more specialized community-oriented roles. There were controls for significant factors such as experience and specialized training. Community policing was tested across a number of issues that focused on policing style, officer length of service, degree of community-policing training, as well as controlling for geographic, demographic, and social and criminological elements within and around specific beats. The four principal research methods were police officer focus groups; the collection and analysis of official records, including geographically based offense data and calls-for-service data for the beats to which these officers were assigned; surveys of COPS AHEAD officers and the communities they serve; and observation of officer activities. Findings suggest that the COPS AHEAD deployment can have an impact on selected crime types such as drug offenses, while encouraging the local community to report more serious crime; the selection of the communities to receive such efforts is crucial. Perhaps the strongest findings of this research were related to the adoption of community and problem-oriented policing styles by the officers assigned to the COPS AHEAD beats. It is clear that departments can, through the manipulation of assignments and exposure to new policing ideas, shape policing styles. The assessment of the beat-level impacts suggests that results were achieved, albeit in a community-oriented and problem-oriented response system rather than by the criteria of reactive policing. Community-policing and problem-oriented policing in Philadelphia will prove its ongoing effectiveness, however, only if the department will modify its data systems to measure the objectives of community policing, such as disorder and disturbance behaviors often associated with declining community "quality of life." 39 tables, 56 references, and appended evaluation instruments
Main Term(s): Community policing
Index Term(s): Community involvement; Data collections; Evaluation measures; NIJ final report; Pennsylvania; Police effectiveness; Problem-Oriented Policing
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.