skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 194498 Find in a Library
Title: Role of Facilitative Prompts in Interviews of Alleged Sex and Abuse Victims
Journal: Legal and Criminological Psychology  Volume:7  Issue:1  Dated:February 2002  Pages:63-71
Author(s): Irit Hershkowitz
Date Published: February 2002
Page Count: 9
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This study explored the effectiveness of neutral and minimal facilitative prompts in interviews with children.
Abstract: Techniques have been developed by both researchers and forensic interviewers to encourage children to provide narrative responses when they are questioned. This is especially important because the child’s statement in alleged sexual abuse cases is often the most important piece of evidence available to investigators. The purpose of this study was to explore the nature and effectiveness of neutral and minimal facilitative prompts in interviews with children. Also studied was the extent to which their effectiveness varied depending on their location relative to other prompts or on the stage of the interview. Fifty forensic interviews with alleged victims of child sexual abuse were analyzed. They all closely followed the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) investigative protocol. Each of the interviewer’s utterances was classified into one of five categories: invitation, facilitator, directive, option posing, or suggestive. The number of words and details provided in each of the child’s responses were tabulated. Results showed that facilitators proved to play an important role in forensic interviews, with children providing an average of five new substantive details following each facilitator. This finding substantiates recommendations that interviewers listen carefully to children, encouraging them in a neutral way to keep talking. Facilitators seem to communicate quite effectively the interviewers’ interest in and appreciation for the information provided by children, regardless of their age. The effectiveness of facilitators varied depending on their context. Facilitators in the first part of the substantive phase were most effective, perhaps because they occurred during the child’s first narrative, which is known to be longer and richer than any other narrative response. Facilitators were especially fruitful when they followed responses to open-ended invitations in all parts of the interview, whereas they were significantly less effective when they followed responses to directive, option posing or suggestive prompts. These findings raise questions about the designation of facilitators as open-ended prompts that can be combined with invitations into a single category of investigative utterance. 2 tables, 35 references
Main Term(s): Child Sexual Abuse; Child victim interviews
Index Term(s): Inquisitorial systems; Interrogation procedures; Interview and interrogation; Personal interviews; Police interview/interrogation of juvenile; Techniques
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.