skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 199897 Find in a Library
Title: Public and Judicial Attitudes to Punishment in Switzerland (From Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice, P 115-127, 2002, Julian V. Roberts, and Mike Hough, eds., -- See NCJ-199891)
Author(s): Andre Kuhn
Date Published: 2002
Page Count: 13
Sponsoring Agency: Willan Publishing
Portland, OR 97213-3644
Sale Source: Willan Publishing
c/o ISBS, 5804 N.E. Hassalo Street
Portland, OR 97213-3644
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Book (Hardbound)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter discusses whether the extent to which the severity of the sanctions imposed by judges is consistent with the desires of the public in Switzerland.
Abstract: Four scenarios were created containing all the information necessary to impose a sentence. A representative sample of 654 Swiss judges and a representative sample of the Swiss population (606 people) were then asked to impose a sentence on the 4 offenders. Four hypotheses were tested: (1) whether public and judicial attitudes to punishment varied according to gender; (2) whether attitudes to punishment varied according to age; (3) whether attitudes to punishment varied from one part of the country to another; and (4) whether public attitudes to punishment were more punitive than the judicial opinions. Findings show that no differences between male and female judges emerged with respect to the sanctions. Age did not significantly influence the sentences delivered by the judges. The responses of the judges revealed a high degree of homogeneity. Judges and the public seemed to agree on the high importance of rehabilitation and punishment, and the low importance of the satisfaction of the victim as a goal of sentencing. Judges assigned more importance to specific deterrence, whereas the public significantly preferred incapacitation. In terms of preferred average prison terms for specific cases, the Swiss public was more punitive than their judges. This finding reflects a skewing of the average by a small proportion of highly punitive respondents; the majority of respondents actually proposed sentences that were more lenient than those of the judges. Public attitudes to punishment varied according to the degree of knowledge of the criminal justice system; the more ignorant of the judiciary, the more punitive people were. A change in public attitudes to punishment could be obtained by changing the small group of highly punitive people. This target group seems to live in large cities, be economically and educationally disadvantaged, and relatively uninterested in politics. 4 tables, 22 notes, 35 references
Main Term(s): Public Opinion of Corrections; Switzerland
Index Term(s): Citizen satisfaction; Corrections policies; Foreign courts; Public Attitudes/Opinion; Public education; Public Opinion of the Courts
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.