skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 199951 Find in a Library
Title: Sex Offender Laws: Can Treatment, Punishment, Incapacitation, and Public Safety Be Reconciled?
Journal: Criminal Justice Review  Volume:27  Issue:2  Dated:Autumn 2002  Pages:256-283
Author(s): Mary Ann Farkas; Amy Stichman
Date Published: 2002
Page Count: 28
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the underlying assumptions and justifications for sex offender laws, with attention to whether treatment, punishment, and public safety can be reconciled as justifications for the laws.
Abstract: Sex offenders are generally viewed by the public and legislators as more objectionable, less treatable, more dangerous, and more likely to recidivate than most other types of offenders. In recent years, sex offenders have become the focus of intense legal scrutiny, primarily through laws that target them for indefinite confinement, registration and community notification, polygraph testing, and chemical castration. This study involved a comprehensive review of the legal, health science, and social science literature, as well as an exploration of relevant court cases, legal analyses, and law reviews concerning the intent and goals of the laws. The theoretical and research literature was examined to determine the types, behaviors, and motivations of sex offenders and the therapeutic approaches for the various kinds of sex offenders. The authors conclude that laws and policies that target sex offenders are designed to punish and incapacitate them for fear of what they might do in the future rather than for their crimes of conviction. Civil commitment laws provide a process for indefinitely confining a sex offender. Community notification, chemical castration, and polygraph statutes extend social control over the sex offender released to the community. The controls are justified by policymakers as necessary to help sex offenders to change or to manage their behavior, as well as to be reintegrated into society; however, the practical effects of the laws are usually punitive and incapacitative, subverting any genuine attempt at treatment. Lacking any differentiation among sex offenders and absent any effective treatment or emphasis on long-term behavioral change, it is unlikely that these laws will provide community protection. 109 references
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Castration of rapists; Civil commitment; Convicted offender incapacitation; Punishment; Selective incapacitation; Sex Offender Registration; Sex offender treatment; Sex offenders; State laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.