skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 199982 Find in a Library
Title: Evaluation of Conflict Resolution Interventions, Part II: Emerging Practice and Theory
Author(s): Cheyanne Church; Julie Shouldice
Date Published: March 2003
Page Count: 32
Sponsoring Agency: INCORE International Conflict Research
Northern Ireland BT48 7JA,
Publication Number: ISBN 0 9540406 3 5
Sale Source: INCORE International Conflict Research
(University of Ulster & The United National University)
Aberfoyle House, Northland Road
Northern Ireland BT48 7JA,
United Kingdom
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This document discusses the challenges of evaluating conflict resolution interventions.
Abstract: Many evaluation approaches currently in use cannot be adapted for implementation in conflict resolution (CR) environments, where the context is constantly changing and the time frame for results can extend over years or generations. The fear exists that evaluation may expose the fact that conflict resolution might not achieve the results that have popularly been attributed to its work. Despite the challenges, valuable information can be gained through the evaluation process. A CR evaluator can take on different roles, such as operative or consultant, depending on the goal or purpose of the evaluation. There is a spectrum of engagement between the evaluator and the project. The evaluator can be external or internal in the project, or in the middle with a compromise between these extremes. Developing a code of conduct for CR evaluators is one way to address the challenge of doing no harm and examining whether the evaluation itself is ethically responsible. Political motivation can affect the credibility and value of the evaluation’s findings. The issue of who owns the evaluation and who determines its distribution can affect the information that is provided through the process. Two gaps emerge in the theoretical understanding of conflict resolution. The first is addressing if and how change is affected beyond the direct participants in a project. The second is evaluating the ideas that underpin actions. Theory-based evaluation, which explores how and why an initiative works, provides a possible starting point for future evaluations of working assumptions and theories of change. Enough experience has been acquired in conflict resolution to allow the field to become more critical of how interventions are conducted and more sophisticated in analyzing their effects. But the information gathered is often under-utilized and overly simplistic. It is hoped that, by considering more of the factors that influence the project and its evaluation, evaluations will contribute to an improvement in both practice and theory. 8 diagrams, 25 footnotes, 2 appendices, bibliography
Main Term(s): Conflict resolution; Program evaluation
Index Term(s): Counseling; Crisis intervention; Dispute resolution; Local criminal justice systems; Neighborhood justice centers; Programs
Note: Downloaded April 16, 2003
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.