skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 199997 Find in a Library
Title: Weighing the Watchman: Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Outsourcing Correctional Services, Part I: Employing a Best-value Approach to Procurement
Author(s): Geoffrey E. Segal; Adrian T. Moore
Corporate Author: Reason Public Policy Institute (RPPI)
United States of America
Project Director: Adrian T. Moore
Date Published: 2002
Page Count: 29
Sponsoring Agency: Reason Public Policy Institute (RPPI)
Los Angeles, CA 90034
Sale Source: Reason Public Policy Institute (RPPI)
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report analyzes the costs and benefits of privatizing correctional services.
Abstract: Due to swelling prison populations and fiscal constraints, correctional authorities have turned to the private sector for the construction, financing, and operation of prisons. There are several factors that justify privatizing correctional services, including improved quality, improved capacity management, improved accountability and risk management, innovation, access to expertise and new services, and improved efficiency and flexibility. One of the most important benefits of privatizing correctional services is that it reduces governmental costs. Nearly all of the 28 studies reviewed in this report found that private prison costs were between 5 to 15 percent lower than public prison costs. However, the opponents to privatizing correctional services argue that quality and security are sacrificed in order to save money. Yet many studies have shown that private prisons offer at least the level of security and quality of services that government-run correctional facilities offer. The key to the successful privatization of correctional services is to clearly identify goals and expectations. The report notes that the effect of privatization is competition, which reduces costs and improves quality, security, and services. 60 Endnotes
Main Term(s): Corrections management; Privatization in corrections
Index Term(s): Correctional facilities; Corrections policies; Corrections research; Private sector-government cooperation; Privatization
Note: Reason Public Policy Institute Policy Study 289; downloaded April 16, 2003.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.