skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 200102 Find in a Library
Title: Randomized Experiment Testing Inmate Classification Systems
Journal: Criminology & Public Policy  Volume:2  Issue:2  Dated:March 2003  Pages:215-242
Author(s): Richard A. Berk; Heather Ladd; Heidi Graziano; Jong-Ho Baek
Date Published: March 2003
Page Count: 28
Publisher: http://www.criminologyandpublicpolicy.com 
Type: Test/Measurement
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article describes the development and testing of a new inmate classification scoring system.
Abstract: When inmates enter the California prison system, they are classified according to the level of supervision required for them; the higher the security classification, the more restrictive the prison environment. The authors developed a new classification system to better predict inmate misconduct. The development process involved removing outdated items that have been shown to have no association with prison misconduct and adding several new variables that have proven useful in predicting inmate behavior. In order to test the new classification system, 20,000 inmates were randomly assigned to have their security level determined by either (a) using the standard scoring system or (b) using the new scoring system. Researchers focused on examining the key outcomes of amount and type of misconduct in prison and prison overcrowding. Results indicated that the new system performed better at sorting inmates according to their level of risk, especially in the case of predicting serious misconduct in prison. Although there is the potential of crowding problems, the new system is better than the old system in terms of accurate sorting and its ease of use. Tables, references
Main Term(s): Inmate classification
Index Term(s): California; Corrections effectiveness; Inmate misconduct; Instrument validation; Prison overcrowding
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=200102

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.