skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 200251 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Turning Necessity Into Virtue: Pittsburgh's Experience With a Federal Consent Decree
Author(s): Robert C. Davis; Christopher W. Ortiz; Nicolel J. Henderson; Joel Miller; Michelle K. Massie
Corporate Author: Vera Institute of Justice
United States of America
Date Published: August 6, 2002
Page Count: 81
Sponsoring Agency: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS)
Washington, DC 20530
Vera Institute of Justice
New York, NY 10279
Grant Number: 2001-CK-WX-K037
Sale Source: Vera Institute of Justice
233 Broadway, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10279
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: Agency Summary|PDF|Text
Agency Summary: 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report examines the 5-year experience of the police and citizens of Pittsburgh under a Federal court consent decree (statement of specific policy and practice changes the city must make), drawing lessons for other cities.
Abstract: This report is based on structured interviews with the police chief, the Federal court monitor, and city administrators. Researchers conducted focus groups with police officers and their supervisors and examined official data on police activity, public safety, discipline, and morale among police officers. Researchers also interviewed a cross-section of community activists and conducted a survey of 400 residents. The suit from which the decree stemmed alleged that "there is a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers of the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police that deprives persons of rights, privileges, and immunities secured and protected by the Constitution and the laws of the United States." The decree that resulted from the court hearing of this suit instructed the Bureau of Police to make comprehensive changes in oversight, training, and supervision of officers. Among the key elements of the decree was a requirement that the Bureau develop a computerized early-warning system to track individual officers' behavior; document uses of force, traffic stops, and searches; and provide annual training in cultural diversity, integrity, and ethics. The decree also required changes in the processing of citizen complaints. The reforms were monitored through quarterly reports to the court by a court-appointed monitor. The current evaluation identifies several elements of the Pittsburgh experience that helped bring the police department quickly into compliance with the decree. The mayor and other officials formed a strong and effective implementation committee that guided systematic compliance with the requirements of the decree. The study highlights the importance of public relations and employee relations for police departments that are engaged in reform. The survey of Pittsburgh residents indicated that public opinion of the police has improved in a number of respects, although improvements are perceived to be larger among Whites than among Blacks. Some community leaders continue to be concerned that accountability is low in the middle ranks of the police department and that the department is not yet capable of monitoring itself. 16 figures and appended details of the citizen survey
Main Term(s): Police reform
Index Term(s): Court ordered institutional reform; Court orders; Pennsylvania; Police corruption; Police corruption causes; Police misconduct
Note: Downloaded August 19, 2003.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.