skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 200276 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Police and Community Problem Solving in Chicago
Author(s): Wesley G. Skogan; Lynn Steiner; Jason Bennis
Corporate Author: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority
United States of America
Date Published: April 2003
Page Count: 4
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
Washington, DC 20531
Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority
Chicago, IL 60606
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Grant Number: 00-DB-MU-0017
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority
300 West Adams Street
Suite 200
Chicago, IL 60606
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: News/Media
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This evaluation summary presents findings from the 2002 study of Chicago's Alternative Policing Strategy (CAPS), with attention to problemsolving as one of the core elements of CAPS.
Abstract: A "problem" is defined as a group of related incidents or situations that concern a significant portion of those who live or work in a particular area. "Problems" are characterized by their persistence, as they are unlikely to be resolved without significant intervention. The CAPS evaluation examined how Chicago police addressed neighborhood problems. A sample of 68 problem sites was drawn from a database of all of the beat problems that had been officially identified and ranked by police. The study focused on the problems that were most often identified as local priorities, namely, drugs, gangs, property crime, and social disorder. Interviews, field observations, and archival data were examined to reconstruct what actions police and residents took at each site; the effectiveness of their problem solving efforts was assessed. Most police problem solving was traditional. The most common strategy was high-visibility patrol. In 59 percent of the beats targeted, police tried to increase arrests or issue more citations. Aggressive stops were used in 38 percent of the sites. Nontraditional policing strategies were used fairly often, particularly for property crime. Prevention awareness programs were operated by police officers, and police worked with businesses to prevent property crime. The success of problem solving efforts was measured in two ways. The interviews with neighborhood residents and police included questions about the problems and what had happened since they were identified as priorities. Data were also used from the police department's 911 center and crime reports filed by officers. Using both kinds of data, selected beats were compared with similar comparison areas to determine whether trends differed. Overall, recorded crime was down in 52 percent of the study beats, and 911 calls were down in only 8 percent. Given that the problems targeted were chronic crime and disorder problems, a 44-52 percent success rate was a positive result when measured against trends in comparable areas.
Main Term(s): Community policing
Index Term(s): Community involvement; Illinois; Police effectiveness; Problem-Oriented Policing
Note: "Program Evaluation Summary," N 3, V 1, April 2003
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.