skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 200485 Find in a Library
Title: Desistance as a Developmental Process: A Comparison of Static and Dynamic Approaches
Journal: Journal of Quantitative Criminology  Volume:19  Issue:2  Dated:June 2003  Pages:129-153
Author(s): Shawn D. Bushway; Terence P. Thornberry; Marvin D. Krohn
Date Published: June 2003
Page Count: 25
Publisher: http://www.wkap.nl/journalhome.htm/0748-4518 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses an alternate measurement approach to desistance as a developmental process.
Abstract: Of the three core dimensions of the criminal career--onset, maintenance, and desistance--desistance is the least studied. This study develops a dynamic approach to the measurement and study of desistance and compares it to the more traditional approach. The key defining characteristic of desistance is behavioral change. An ideal measure of desistance should be able to discriminate between people that continue to offend and people that stop offending; estimate whether the change is permanent; and describe the transition from offending to non-offending. Most previous studies of desistance have adopted a static measure of desistance, which counts everyone that offends at least once before a specified cutoff but not afterwards as a desistor. Individuals that offend in both periods are termed persisters. Weaknesses to the static approach are the arbitrary selection of the cutoff point, the heterogeneity of offenders, and the onset of desistance. In the developmental approach, desistance is defined as a process, not a state. This approach emphasizes the transition from offending to non-offending, rather than the state of non-offending. The transition can be characterized by the age range over which the change takes place and the levels of offending that occur during this process. Analysis was conducted with data from the Rochester Youth Development Study, a multi-wave panel study of the development of delinquent behavior among adolescents and young adults. Results show that the dynamic approach has the advantage of being inherently descriptive. A basic picture of the level of behavior at each point in the life course is provided and individuals that have experienced meaningful change in offending can be identified. The chief advantage of this approach--that it provides estimates of rates of offending at different points of time--is also its major drawback. This statistical method is more difficult to implement than the traditional approach. 3 tables, 20 footnotes, 41 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile delinquency research; Juvenile ex-offenders
Index Term(s): Juvenile delinquency factors; Juvenile delinquent demographic data; Juvenile offender statistics; Juvenile recidivists; Juveniles; Research methods
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=200485

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.