skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 200621 Find in a Library
Title: Police Informer/Handler Relationship: Is It Really Unique?
Journal: International Journal of Police Science and Management  Volume:5  Issue:1  Dated:Spring 2003  Pages:50-62
Author(s): Roger Billingsley
Date Published: 2003
Page Count: 13
Publisher: http://www.henrystewart.com 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article compares the relationship of police informers and other professional partnerships.
Abstract: There is a common assumption that the use of informers is quite unique among police relationships. The informer is a human source of information that assists police officers in their work. The informer is generally a lay person with no recognized qualifications and no rules of guidelines to obey. The police officer that handles that informer is regarded as a professional. The standard professional relationship is an accepted classic relationship involving a professional. General police relationships are examined to determine whether those classic features also exist in policing. The informer/handler relationship is compared to the standard. It is assumed that power and control are the most important features of any professional relationship. What is special about professionals is that they are bound by a stable set of ethical values that guide their behavior. The partnerships between police officers, professionals, and their clients, lay persons, create problems because of differences in priorities and objectives. The similarities between the standard professional relationship and the police professional relationship relate to accountability, bureaucracy, trust, and confidence. It could be argued that the informer/handler relationship is just another example of social behavior between two groups of people. It appears that the main difference between the informer/handler relationship and other professional relationships is the mystique that it creates for itself. Practitioners prefer to hide behind the veil of secrecy to alleviate the need to discuss the relationship. It is this secrecy that helps to produce an assumed model that suggests the relationship is different from any other professional relationship. Perhaps if this veil of secrecy were lifted, the informer/handler relationship might not be treated so differently from other professional relationships. 1 table, 42 references
Main Term(s): Informants; Police research
Index Term(s): Groups; Information collection; Intelligence acquisition; Police professionalism; Psychology of law enforcement; Public Opinion of the Police
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=200621

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.