skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 200847 Find in a Library
Title: Limitations on Trial by Jury
Journal: International Review of Penal Law  Volume:72  Issue:1-2  Dated:2001  Pages:603-609
Author(s): Peter Duff
Date Published: 2001
Page Count: 7
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: France
Annotation: This article discusses the limitations of the jury system.
Abstract: One of the most interesting things about jury trial is how infrequently it actually takes place given the enormous significance given to it by the public. The devices used to restrict the number of jury trials are generally regarded as legitimate. The right to trial by jury may be limited by the law itself, prosecutorial discretion, judicial decision, and defense waiver. Most jurisdictions adopt various combinations of some or all of these strategies. In most jurisdictions, procedural criminal law dictates that only a small minority of serious crimes are eligible for trial by jury. Otherwise, the criminal justice process would not be able to cope with the volume of work and the expense would be huge. There are two ways in which the prosecutor may play a role in determining the proportion and number of jury trials: by playing a direct role in selecting the mode of trial, and plea-bargaining. In some jurisdictions, the court has a say in determining whether there should be the possibility of trial by jury. Magistrates will take into consideration the nature of the case, their sentencing powers, and other factors set out in the relevant legislation. It is relatively uncommon to give the accused the right to determine the mode of trial. The present trend in the common law jurisdictions is towards further reducing the number of jury trials by increasing the scope of these limitations. These attempts to cut costs are often very controversial and portrayed as an attack on the integrity of the institution of trial by jury. The gap between jury practice and jury ideology can be difficult to manage because the legitimacy of the varying regimes is always vulnerable to change. 13 footnotes, 12 references
Main Term(s): Juries; Right to trial by jury
Index Term(s): Decisionmaking; Jury decisionmaking; Jury waiver system; Public Attitudes/Opinion; Rights of the accused; Trial procedures; Trials
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.