skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 200918 Find in a Library
Title: Questions Unanswered: The Fifth Amendment and Innocent Witnesses
Journal: The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology  Volume:93  Issue:1  Dated:Fall 2002  Pages:259-288
Author(s): Angela Roxas
Editor(s): Matthew Burke
Date Published: 2002
Page Count: 30
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper presents arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court’s analysis of Ohio v. Reiner concluding that an innocent witness may validly claim the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
Abstract: The fifth amendment provides that “no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” Ohio v. Reiner (2001) extended the Supreme Court’s application of the fifth amendment protecting only those witnesses who have reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer. In Reiner, the Court examined whether a witness who denies all culpability in a child’s death may still exercise a valid fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The U.S. Supreme Court concluded that a witness who asserts innocence may not be deprived the privilege against self-incrimination based on the idea that one of the fifth amendment's basic functions is to protect innocent men. In its conclusion, the Court expanded the privilege which continues the trend in fifth amendment cases and the Court relied principally on a policy rationale that the privilege against self-incrimination is to protect innocent men; this was considered a weak justification. In addition, the Court failed to address the issue of whether the prosecution should grant immunity to an innocent witness. The decision in the Reiner case, considered weak, leaves questions unanswered with respect to the complexities of the fifth amendment in the context of innocent witnesses.
Main Term(s): US Supreme Court decisions
Index Term(s): Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Court system; Judicial decisions; Right against self incrimination; State courts; State supreme courts; Witness immunity; Witnesses; Witnesses rights
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.