skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 201022 Find in a Library
Title: Van Rechtbank Naar Kanton (From District Court to Subdistrict Court)
Author(s): R. J. J. Eshuis; G. Paulides
Date Published: 2002
Page Count: 108
Sponsoring Agency: Netherlands Ministry of Justice
2500 Eh the Hague, Netherlands
Publication Number: ISBN 90-5454-265-9
Sale Source: Netherlands Ministry of Justice
Research and Documentation Centre
Box 20301
2500 Eh the Hague,
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Book (Softbound)
Language: Dutch
Country: Netherlands
Annotation: This report evaluates the 1999 measure of moving commercial civil disputes valued between 5,000 and 10,000 Dutch guilders to subdistrict courts.
Abstract: Commercial civil disputes were formally handled by district courts, however, in 1999 civil disputes with a value up to 10,000 Dutch guilders were moved to subdistrict courts for the purpose of reducing legal aid. Subdistrict courts allow the defendant to choose cheaper legal aid, by allowing defendants to either represent themselves or choose representation from an attorney-at-law, a bailiff, or anyone educated in the law. The evaluation involved a comparative study of cases handled by district courts (settled in 1996) and cases handled by subdistrict courts (settled in 2000). Findings revealed that the defense choices of defendants in subdistrict courts resulted in lower legal costs. Furthermore, subdistrict courts were found to process their cases more quickly and efficiently than district courts, perhaps as a result of the standardization of cases that is undertaken in subdistrict courts. The study also found that most plaintiffs in subdistrict courts had legal representation while most of the defendants did not. This last finding is an area for future research.
Main Term(s): Court research; Netherlands
Index Term(s): Court case flow; Court management; Court records; Court reform; Court studies; Court system; Small claims courts
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.