skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 201204 Find in a Library
Title: Confession, Apology, Repentance and Settlement Out-of-Court in the Japanese Criminal Justice System -- is Japan a Model of Restortative Justice? (From Restorative Justice in Context: International Practice and Directions, P 173-196, 2003, Elmar G. M. Weitekamp and Hans-Jurgen Kerner, eds. -- See NCJ
Author(s): Toshio Yoshida
Date Published: 2003
Page Count: 24
Sponsoring Agency: Willan Publishing
Portland, OR 97213-3644
Sale Source: Willan Publishing
c/o ISBS, 5804 N.E. Hassalo Street
Portland, OR 97213-3644
United States of America
Publisher: http://www.isbs.com 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Book (Softbound)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter argues whether Japan is a model of restorative justice or not.
Abstract: Some criminologists in foreign countries have looked for the causes of the low Japanese crime rate. They say that it results from the underlying assumption of restorative justice that has traditionally been practiced in Japanese criminal justice. The practice and theory of Japanese criminal justice deserves a closer look. The Japanese criminal law system today knows only the traditional punishment that dissociates the offender and the victim from each other. The Japanese criminal justice system is in need of reform that will enable the remorseful offender to take on his or her accountability voluntarily. It is desirable to lay the legal foundations for victim-offender reconciliation or mediation, including the infrastructure necessary to support this. A stronger orientation of the criminal justice system towards restorative justice not only helps to address the consequences of crime, but will also contribute to a lowering of the crime rates. What the concept of restorative justice means differs depending on its advocates. But there are many common grounds, such as a voluntary and constructive collective response to the offense, peaceful settlement of conflict between victim and offender, community service, and payment of money to charity or similar under the control of the criminal justice authorities. In Japan, supportive and protective measures for victims have been implemented in various legal reforms. However, it is clear that they have all been taken in a framework in which they are compatible with the traditional offender-oriented retributive criminal law theory. It is suggested that Japan is not a model of the idea of restorative justice. A shift in perspectives or paradigms is necessary. This includes a change in thoughts from the concept of an individual-moralistic retributive criminal law to that of the victim-offender community-state interrelated act criminal law. 2 tables, 5 notes, 36 references
Main Term(s): Japan; Restitution
Index Term(s): Foreign criminal justice systems; Intermediate sanctions; Sentencing factors; Sentencing/Sanctions; Victim attitudes; Victim compensation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=201204

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.