skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 201209 Find in a Library
Title: Within or Outside the System? Restorative Justice Attempts and the Penal System (From Restorative Justice in Context: International Practice and Directions, P 272-284, 2003, Elmar G. M. Weitekamp and Hans-Jurgen Kerner, eds. -- See NCJ-201195)
Author(s): Thomas Trenczek
Date Published: 2003
Page Count: 13
Sponsoring Agency: Willan Publishing
Portland, OR 97213-3644
Sale Source: Willan Publishing
c/o ISBS, 5804 N.E. Hassalo Street
Portland, OR 97213-3644
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Book (Softbound)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter deals with the problematical aspects and consequences of the implementation of TOA (the German version of victim-offender reconciliation).
Abstract: TOA is an acronym of a term that translates into offender-victim balancing, which means both settlement and reconciliation. TOA is and can only be an offer to victims and offenders/the accused to find, with the help of a neutral mediator, a consensual solution of the conflict that led to or came out of the criminal act. There are several provisions in the German juvenile and criminal code that make it possible to consider victim-offender reconciliation within judicial decisionmaking. The number and content of the provisions seem to provide an ideal basis for a substantial use of victim-offender reconciliation within the criminal justice system. But the inherent nature of criminal law gives victim-offender reconciliation almost no chance of becoming a hopeful alternative to punishment-oriented policies. Victim-offender reconciliation is being used for the treatment of minor offenses. TOA programs are not being used in great numbers. The TOA program was introduced into the juvenile criminal code as a judicial “educational” measure, but this is contradictory. It seems to be a hopeless attempt to establish acceptance for victim-offender reconciliation within the criminal justice system without adaptation and co-optation. The practical experience with the TOA shows that victim-offender reconciliation is not the only or ideal way, but that on a continuum of possible steps in the treatments of conflicts, it is one possible area of use. Such a dispute-resolution culture cannot replace the judicial system totally, but the parallel system of mediation can fill a gap that exists between the self-organized regulating mechanism in the population and the judicial system. 3 notes, 23 references
Main Term(s): Germany; Victim-offender reconciliation
Index Term(s): Alternatives to institutionalization; Community Service Restitution Program; Conflict resolution; Foreign criminal justice systems; Restitution centers; Victim compensation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.