skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 201229 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Recidivism Rates for Drug Court Graduates: Nationally Based Estimates, Final Report
Series: NIJ Research Report
Author(s): John Roman; Wendy Townsend; Avinash Singh Bhati Ph.D.
Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America

ICF International
United States of America
Date Published: 2002
Page Count: 66
Sponsoring Agency: ICF International
Fairfax, VA 22031
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
The Urban Institute
Washington, DC 20037
Grant Number: OJP-99-C-010
Sale Source: The Urban Institute
2100 M Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This federally supported study provides nationally representative estimates of recidivism rates for the average drug court graduate and are intended to be used as benchmarks in later research.
Abstract: This study supported by the U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice presents a general estimate of recidivism among a nationally representative sample of drug court graduates. Its intent is to assist policymakers by developing a single estimate of recidivism rates from a consistent data source and to create a benchmark for drug court practitioners and researchers. In this study, recidivism was measured as any arrest for a serious offense resulting in the filing of a charge. A major contribution of this study was the use of a single, consistent measure of recidivism drawn from a consistent data source, the internal FBI criminal history database. It is suggested that at least 95 percent of police agencies consistently report data to this database. In order to measure the average recidivism rate for drug court graduates, this study consisted of 2,020 graduates in 1999 and 2000 from 95 drug courts, which is designed to be representative of approximately 17,000 annual drug court graduates. The criminal history of these graduates was analyzed to estimate the likelihood of re-arrest during the first year after graduation and weighted to represent all graduates of the 95 courts during this period. Study results indicate: (1) that within 1 year 16.4 percent of drug court graduates had been arrested and charged with a serious offense, rising to 27.5 percent within 2 years; (2) that in the first year after graduation, drug court graduates averaged 2.23 serious crimes per person and 0.50 serious crimes per person in the first 2 years after graduation; (3) that drug courts with high recidivism rates are serving the most difficult to reach populations; and (4) that recidivism among drug court graduates appears to be related to the size of the drug court. It is believed that these benchmark estimates will assist in efforts to measure drug court impact. However, these estimates should be considered in isolation due, in part, to the fact that drug courts operate in multifaceted environments. Study limitations included underestimating the recidivism rates by not counting all arrests and by not taking into account that not all participants can be matched to their FBI records. In addition, due to definitional issues, the study may overestimate the recidivism rate. In summary, there is no single estimate that can, or should be used to measure whether an individual drug court is successful. Figures and appendices A-C
Main Term(s): Drug Courts
Index Term(s): Arrest records; Court reform; Criminal histories; Drug offenders; Juvenile drug courts; NIJ final report; NIJ grant-related documents; Recidivism; Recidivism prediction; Recidivism statistics; Recidivists
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.