skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 201302 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Perceptions of the Courts in Your Community: The Influence of Experience, Race and Ethnicity, Final Report
Author(s): David B. Rottman Ph.D.; Randall Hansen; Nicole Mott Ph.D.; Lynn Grimes
Corporate Author: National Ctr for State Courts
United States of America
Date Published: January 2003
Page Count: 113
Sponsoring Agency: National Ctr for State Courts
Williamsburg, VA 23185-4147
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 1999-IJ-CX-0021
Sale Source: National Ctr for State Courts
300 Newport Avenue
Williamsburg, VA 23185-4147
United States of America
Document: PDF
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined how race and recent court experience influences perceptions of State courts.
Abstract: A random national sample of 1,567 American adults probed the issue of how race and ethnicity intersect with court experience to influence views of State courts. Chapter 1 reviews the theoretical and research literature about public opinion and the American court system. Chapter 2 describes the research methodology, which involved telephone interviews with an overall sample of 1,567 adults, 705 of whom were randomly sampled, 308 were an over-sample of African Americans, 254 were an over-sample of Latinos, and 300 were an over-sample of those with recent court experience (past 12 months). Chapter 3 focuses on how racial and ethnic differences influence perceptions of the courts, both for those with court experience and for those with no court experience. Issues gleaned from the surveys are the focus of this chapter; the discussion looks specifically at how respondents perceived court fairness and whether they held perceptions that the court engages in differential treatment based on race. Chapter 4 focuses more specifically on how experience with courts interacts with race and ethnicity to produce perceptions of court. The chapter specifically reports on who has court experience, how those with court experience perceived the court’s fairness, how much support court users give to courts, perceptions of future fairness, important information sources that influence perceptions of court fairness, and finally looks at the distinctiveness of Latino perceptions of the courts. Chapter 5 offers the study conclusions and implications, and specifically addresses how the current research findings fit within the body of literature discussed in Chapter 1. Generally, the findings indicated that the public offers middle ratings of court fairness and low ratings of fairness in procedures, outcomes, and equality of treatment. Perceptions of differential court treatment were more pronounced for low income, or socioeconomic status, than for racial or ethnic status. Another important finding revealed that the public continues to perceive the courts as too costly and time consuming. Perceptions of court fairness among those with recent court experiences were slightly more negative than the perceptions held by people who had not recently been to court. Study implications include support for programs that focus on court and community collaboration. Tables, charts, references, and appendix
Main Term(s): Public Opinion of the Courts
Index Term(s): Ethnic groups; NIJ grant-related documents; Perception; Race-punishment relationship; State courts
Note: See NCJ-201356 for the Executive Summary.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.