skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 201322 Find in a Library
Title: Annual Report on the Use of Electronic Surveillance
Corporate Author: Canada Solicitor General
Date Published: 2001
Page Count: 22
Sponsoring Agency: Canada Solicitor General
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0P8, Canada
Sale Source: Canada Solicitor General
340 Laurier Avenue, West
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0P8,
Type: Report (Annual/Periodic)
Format: Document
Language: English; French
Country: Canada
Annotation: This document discusses the requirements of judicially authorized interception of private communications by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), provincial, and municipal police forces.
Abstract: The report also contains information related to certain Criminal Code offenses that occurred in the Northwest Territories, Nunavut, or Yukon, as well as offenses that meet either of the requirements set out in Section II of the Security Offenses Act. Section II provides an overview of the key procedural requirements of Part VI of the Criminal Code. This provision came into force on July 1, 1974, and protects the privacy of Canadians by making it an offense to intercept private communications except as provided for by law, while providing the police with the means to obtain judicial authorizations to conduct electronic surveillance to assist in criminal investigations. One key feature is that a police investigator must swear an affidavit deposing to the facts relied upon to justify the belief that an authorization or warrant should be given. Another feature is that an agent designated by the Solicitor General is responsible for ensuring that all matters relating to the application comply with the law, and that the matter is serious enough to warrant the application. A final key feature is that the judge, when considering the application, must be satisfied that granting the authorization would be in the best interests of the administration of justice. Section III presents data provided by agents of the Solicitor General that are designated pursuant to the Criminal Code and information contained in the operational reports of police forces that requested that applications be made for authorized interception. Section IV provides a general assessment of the importance of electronic surveillance for the investigation, detection, prevention, and prosecution of offenses in Canada. 8 tables, 5 figures, 2 appendices
Main Term(s): Canada; Electronic surveillance
Index Term(s): Covert entry; Eavesdropping warrant; Foreign laws; Surveillance; Telecommunications; Visual electronic surveillance
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.