skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 201343 Find in a Library
Title: Commissioning Drug Services for Vulnerable Young People
Journal: Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy  Volume:10  Issue:3  Dated:August 2003  Pages:251-262
Author(s): Jane Powell; Mathew Jones; Richard Kimberlee
Date Published: August 2003
Page Count: 12
Publisher: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper examines the influence and outcome of government-prompted collaboration among agencies responsible for commissioning drug services for young people.
Abstract: In the United Kingdom, the government has put forth a vision of health care that promotes the collaboration of agencies involved in delivering health care needs, including drug rehabilitation services, to the country’s youth. The goal of the paper is to describe the way in which the government recommendations concerning commissioning practices for youth drug services are reflected in the actual practices of the agencies. The authors also explore how the commissioning process works to meet the current and future needs of drug addicted youth. A case-study methodology was employed to gain information about commissioning practices; methods included 20 unstructured interviews with personnel from all agencies involved with youth services, documentary analysis, and a participate observation of 3 formal committee meetings. Findings revealed that an overriding emphasis of commissioning practices was on the process of the commissioning rather than the outcome of the commissioning decision. Perhaps contributing to this problem is the fact that agencies lack readily available research data on which to base policy. The author recommends that a multi-agency strategy be agreed upon by all involved agencies and that mechanisms for monitoring commissioning practices and outcomes be implemented. Notes, references
Main Term(s): Juvenile drug treatment
Index Term(s): Cooperation among juvenile agencies; Interagency cooperation; United Kingdom (UK)
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=201343

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.