skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 201405 Find in a Library
Title: States Take Federal Funding to Task
Journal: Biodefense Quarterly  Volume:4  Issue:1  Dated:Summer 2002  Pages:1-2,8
Author(s): Elin Gursky
Date Published: 2002
Page Count: 3
Type: Program/Project Description
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article describes how Maryland has used funding under the Federal Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 to strengthen its public health system to better prepare to respond to a terrorist attack.
Abstract: The appropriations bill sent $1.1 billion to 62 States and territories and 3 major cities (Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York). The fiscal year 2002 funds included $918 million to support preparedness capacities of State and local public health agencies and $125 million to create hospital response plans. To qualify for funding, States developed work plans that address six required areas: preparedness planning and readiness assessment; surveillance and epidemiology capacity; laboratory capacity for biologic agents; communications and information technology; risk, communication, and health information dissemination; and education and training. From the outset, all essential stakeholders assumed a role in developing the Maryland Bioterrorism Plan through the State's Public Health Bioterrorism Preparedness Advisory Group. State public health officials developed a three-tiered strategy for allocating funds to local public health agencies. Complicating the best use of Federal public health dollars in Maryland is the existence of differing levels of readiness across local health agencies and the need to draw local enhancements into the overall State objectives. In addition, there are varying interests among local public entities for expenditures on technology compared to planning and personnel. State policymakers prefer that 60 percent of funding be used to address workforce issues; however, local health agencies may perceive that the remaining 40 percent to be spent on sophisticated tools and equipment as the easier investment. Of the six focus areas, preparedness planning and readiness assessment will receive the largest allocation of funds to local health departments in Maryland. The development of proficiency in all six areas of public health operation is acknowledged by State officials to require long-term commitment and sustained funding. 3 notes
Main Term(s): Domestic Preparedness
Index Term(s): Biological weapons; Counter-terrorism tactics; Emergency procedures; Federal aid; Maryland; Medical and dental services; Medical Readiness; Terrorist weapons; Victim medical assistance
Note: Downloaded July 30, 2003.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.