skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 201637 Find in a Library
Title: Australian Study Assesses the Strengths of Restorative Justice for Crime Victims
Journal: Crime Victims Report  Volume:7  Issue:3  Dated:July/August 2003  Pages:35-36,44
Author(s): Russ Immarigeon
Date Published: July 2003
Page Count: 3
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article describes a recent study (2002) of restorative justice practices.
Abstract: The author begins by reviewing the historical context of the contemporary restorative justice movement. It is asserted that although the ideological underpinnings of restorative justice call for a balanced approach toward victims and offenders, most restorative interventions are inadequate and result in an imbalance of services. The approach to victim-offender relationships in restorative models remains largely undefined and ambiguous. The author then goes on to discuss Heather Strang’s 2002 study of restorative justice interventions, which focused especially on victim-oriented expectations and outcomes. Data for the study were drawn from the Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE), and supplemented by interviews and correspondences with crime victims and crime victim advocates. The study brings to light the fact that victims of crime express the basic complaint that there is no focus within the justice system on the reparation of harm. Furthermore, victims also report that there is a persistent neglect of the nonmaterial aspect of victimization that includes psychological and emotional consequences. The study goes on to examine how restorative justice practices struggle between a focus on support services versus victim rights services. Findings from the study indicate that victims of crime who experience a restorative justice approach versus those who receive a traditional criminal justice approach are more satisfied with the outcome of their cases and feel more at peace both with the process and with their offender. The flexibility of the restorative justice approach is described as one of its main attributes, allowing it to accommodate real-life situations more easily than the traditional criminal justice model, which is viewed as more rigid and rule-bound. In conclusion, while restorative justice approaches are not ideal, they are more amenable to accounting for the experiences and needs of crime victims than the traditional model of justice.
Main Term(s): Restorative Justice
Index Term(s): Criminal Justice System Response to Victims; Victim attitudes; Victim reactions to crime; Victim reactions to the Criminal Justice System; Victim services; Victim-offender relationships
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=201637

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.