skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 201688 Find in a Library
Title: Child Abuse Professionals: What Does Hearsay Have To Do With You?
Journal: The Prosecutor  Volume:37  Issue:4  Dated:July/August 2003  Pages:20-23,26,28,29
Author(s): Laura L. Rogers
Date Published: July 2003
Page Count: 7
Publisher: http://www.ndaa.org/ 
Type: Instructional Material
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article instructs child abuse professionals (CAP's) in the rules of hearsay evidence as they might apply in a case of child abuse, so the CAP will know what types of hearsay statements he/she should record in the course of a child abuse investigation.
Abstract: The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) and the common law provide that "hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted." Hearsay can be reduced to the following three elements: the utterance is a statement; the statement was not made during the current court proceeding; and the statement is offered to prove the defendant's guilt. Statements can be oral, written, or nonverbal. Statements made by the perpetrator are always admissible against him/her at trial if the prosecutor offers them into evidence; for example, if the perpetrator says to the CAP, "I should not have shaken him so hard," the prosecutor may ask the CAP to repeat the statement at trial. If the statement is taken in violation of a person's constitutional or Miranda rights, the statement may be excluded. If a CAP asks the perpetrator at an emergency scene of an unconscious child, "What happened?", the perpetrator's response is not in violation of Miranda because he/she is not in custody. Documented statements must be verbatim. Often, courts will refuse to allow a paraphrased statement to be used in court. If a statement is made during a formal interview, a verbatim recording of the questions posed is helpful in obtaining admission of the response at trial. Although hearsay statements are typically inadmissible in court, since they are viewed as untrustworthy and unreliable, there are several commonly used exceptions. These exceptions are excited-utterance statements, state-of-mind statements, statements made for medical diagnosis, present-sense-impression statements, and the "catch-all" exceptions. This article explains the nature of each of these exceptions and provides examples of how they may apply in child abuse cases. 29 notes
Main Term(s): Juvenile victims
Index Term(s): Child abuse and neglect hearings; Child abuse investigations; Hearsay evidence; Rules of evidence
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=201688

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.