skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 201939 Find in a Library
Title: Goals of Corrections: Perspectives From the Line
Journal: Criminal Justice Review  Volume:28  Issue:1  Dated:Spring 2003  Pages:47-69
Author(s): Misty Kifer; Craig Hemmens; Mary K. Stohr
Date Published: 2003
Page Count: 23
Publisher: http://www.gsu.edu/cjr 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article compares the attitudes of correctional officers in a variety of facilities, including jails and different types of prisons.
Abstract: The four different goals of corrections are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation. Corrections personnel determine or shape the way the system runs, the quality of services that inmates receive, and the way inmates are treated. If they do not agree with a given policy or practice they can thwart its implementation. It is important to know correctional staff beliefs in order to find better ways to shape them through training or hiring practices. In 1998 and 1999, a three-part survey was administered to staff at five correctional facilities and one jail training academy in a rural mountain state. This article deals with the findings on the third part of the survey, which included items on correctional goal orientation. The results indicate that the jail and prison staff were in general accord as to the primary goal of corrections, as well as the rank ordering of the four potential goals. Incapacitation was favored by prison and jail staff alike, while retribution was least favored by both prison and jail staff. There was some disagreement over the ordering of rehabilitation and deterrence, but the scores for these goals were fairly close. Age, gender, and years of service seemed to affect the degree of support for rehabilitation. Women, older staff, and those with less correctional work experience had a higher level of support for rehabilitation. Those institutions that focused more on custody and control and offered only limited programming contained staff that were generally less supportive of rehabilitation. More research on the impact of institutional mission and subculture, as well as the role of demographic variables that the staff member brings to the corrections workplace, is warranted. 8 tables, 40 references
Main Term(s): Correctional personnel; Correctional personnel attitudes
Index Term(s): Correctional Officers; Correctional Personnel Training; Inmate staff relations; Morale; Prison climate; Work attitudes
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=201939

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.