skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 201942 Find in a Library
Title: Power to Persuade: Presidential Influence Over Congress on Crime Control Policy
Journal: Criminal Justice Review  Volume:28  Issue:1  Dated:Spring 2003  Pages:113-132
Author(s): Willard M. Oliver
Date Published: 2003
Page Count: 20
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses the theory of presidential influence over Congress related to crime control policy.
Abstract: This study aims to determine whether the president’s activity on crime influences Congress to hold more hearings related to crime control policy. The study used a time series regression analysis to predict the impact that presidents have on Congress. Control variables were media, crime, and divided or undivided government. The hypothesis is that a president’s activities on crime influence the number of congressional hearings related to crime. Comparing trend data between presidential activity on crime and drugs and congressional hearings on crime and drugs shows similar patterns across the time series, lending some support to the hypothesis. The first model, which shows presidential influence over Congress within the same year, shows no support for the hypothesis. The only variable that proved to be highly significant in the first and second model was crime rates. Although the president was found to be a significant variable in the second model, it was clear that crime rates, as reported by the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Uniform Crime Reports, were the only variable that was significant in both models. As crime rises, Congress responds with holding hearings in order to understand the causes of the increase in crime, to generate solutions to the rising crime rates, and to draft public laws or review public laws regarding crime and drugs. Both public opinion on crime and media reporting on crime had a significant influence in the lagged model. Although it is clear that the president is an influencing factor on congressional determination to hold hearings on crime and drugs with a 1 year lag, this is true only in relation with several other influencing factors. 1 figure, 3 tables, 11 footnotes, 78 references
Main Term(s): Crime control policies; Political influences
Index Term(s): Crime patterns; Crime Rate; Crime rate studies; Estimated crime incidence; Media coverage; US House of Representatives
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.