skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 202036 Find in a Library
Title: Limits on the Search Waiver Term
Journal: Perspectives  Volume:27  Issue:2  Dated:Spring 2003  Pages:42-45
Author(s): Donna Lee Elm
Date Published: 2003
Page Count: 4
Type: Legislation/Policy Description
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines limits on the search waiver requirement for probationers and parolees.
Abstract: In most States, probationers and parolees are subject to search and seizure by authorities as a condition of their release. The search waiver term was designed as a way of bypassing the fourth amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. The author discusses the Supreme Court case of Griffin v. Wisconsin to illustrate the confusion regarding the search waiver term. In many States, it is unclear whether probation and parole officers (PO’s) are able to conduct a search for any reason whatsoever, even without reasonable suspicion. The Supreme Court in this case adopted a reasonable suspicion standard regarding probation searches, thereby protecting some form of fourth amendment protection for probationers and parolees. The author discusses the confusion regarding this ruling and how States have sought to clarify under what conditions searches are permitted. These conditions involve two main issues: the reasonable suspicion standard and how to distinguish home visits from searches. Finally, the author examines probation seizure laws and illustrates some of the questions regarding seizures through an examination of the case United States v. Giannetta. Ultimately, the standard for probation seizures is the plain view rule which was established in a previous court case. In conclusion, agencies responsible for supervising probationers and parolees should adopt clear policies regarding lawful search and seizure requirements. Endnotes
Main Term(s): Policy analysis; Search and seizure laws
Index Term(s): Parole conditions; Parolees rights; Probation conditions; Probationers rights; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.