skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 202093 Find in a Library
Title: Objective Assessment of Comparison Question Polygraphy
Journal: Polygraph  Volume:32  Issue:2  Dated:2003  Pages:107-126
Author(s): Vance V. MacLaren; Donald J. Krapohl
Date Published: 2003
Page Count: 20
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reports on a system for quantifying psychophysiological information obtained in comparison question polygraph tests (CQT's) that was developed on a sample of 181 confirmed deceptive and 150 nondeceptive field cases.
Abstract: The CQT uses a dynamic interview procedure in which stress responses to questions are observed. At least two classes of questions are present in a CQT exam. Relevant questions (questions related to the event at issue) may be answered with either deceptive or nondeceptive "yes" or "no" answers, and they are compared with a baseline of physiological responses established by presenting "comparison questions." The comparison questions are phrased in such a way that subjects feel they must be deceptive to complete the exam successfully. Comparison questions are intended to thereby elicit emotional arousal in both deceptive and nondeceptive suspects. The system proposed in this article uses permutation tests to obtain separate estimates of the likelihood of deception and nondeception for individual cases. These probabilities are then combined with base rate information to calculate an overall probability of guilt for each case. Assuming a 50-percent base rate of deception and conservative cutoff points for assigning deceptive (p=.90) and nondeceptive (p=.10) outcomes, 91 percent of deceptive cases (N=152) and 98 percent of nondeceptive cases (n=128) with conclusive outcomes were correct. The system was cross-validated on four groups of field cases. Conclusive outcomes were correct in 90 percent of deceptive cases verified by confession (n=97), in 92 percent of deceptive cases verified by urinalysis tests for drug infractions (n=49), and in 64 percent of deceptive cases independently verified by physical evidence or subsequent confession not associated with the polygraph test (n=11). Conclusive outcomes were correct in 88 percent of independently verified nondeceptive cases (n=16). The system was also cross-validated on a sample of laboratory cases drawn from three separate experiments. In the lab samples, 88 percent of conclusive outcomes were correct for both deceptive (n=33) and nondeceptive (n=25) groups. The proposed scoring system circumvents several logical problems with traditional approaches to quantification in CQT polygraphy. It also provides an effective means of obtaining accurate classification in approximately 90 percent of cases. 11 tables, 1 figure, and 33 references
Main Term(s): Science and Technology
Index Term(s): Investigative techniques; Polygraph reliability; Polygraph techniques; Polygraphs
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=202093

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.