skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 202115 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Comparison of Group-administered and Mail-administered Surveys of Alaskan Village Public Safety Officers
Journal: Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management  Volume:26  Issue:2  Dated:2003  Pages:329-340
Author(s): Darryl S. Wood
Editor(s): Robert H. Langworthy
Date Published: 2003
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 98-IJ-CX-0035
Dataset: DATASET 1
Publisher: http://www.emeraldinsight.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper compares the results of a survey of Alaskan Village public safety officers administered both through mail and in groups due to address concerns about the method of administration when surveying police officers.
Abstract: Surveys are among the most commonly used research tools for understanding the police and their role in society. However, little attention has been given to the effects that the various methods of questionnaire administration can have upon the responses to a survey. To maximize response rates, a survey of Alaskan Village public safety officers (VPSOs), supported by the U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice was conducted using both group-administration methods and mail-administration methods. The paper begins by describing both the survey methods employed and the reasons for suspecting differences in the responses of the two groups. It continues with a discussion of the variables thought to be affected by the two different survey methods. It was expected that the responses given by VPSOs to questions regarding their views about their occupation would vary according to whether they completed the survey by mail or in a group setting. The results indicate that there are no discernable differences in the responses given in the two different methods of self-administered survey completion. The findings should serve to sensitize police researchers to the potential for bias resulting from the many different methods of survey administration that are available. References
Main Term(s): Police department surveys
Index Term(s): NIJ grant-related documents; Police agencies; Police organizational structure; Questionnaires; Scientific techniques; Surveys; Techniques
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=202115

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.