skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 202162 Find in a Library
Title: Evaluation of the Fairness of Police Line-Ups and Video Identifications
Author(s): Tim Valentine; Pamela Heaton
Corporate Author: Goldsmiths College
Dept of Psychology
United States of America
Date Published: 1999
Page Count: 14
Sponsoring Agency: Goldsmiths College
London SE14 6NW, England
Nuffield Foundation
London, England
Sale Source: Goldsmiths College
Dept of Psychology
University of London
New Cross
London SE14 6NW,
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This document compares the use of police line-ups and video identification to evaluate for fairness.
Abstract: The fallibility of eyewitness identification has been recognized in England for some time. The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) allows four means of identification to be used: a live line-up or identity parade; group identification; video identification; or confrontation. The majority of eyewitness identifications are obtained by asking a witness to view a live line-up. The rising number of line-ups has led to an interest in developing video as the identification procedure of choice. This research aims to evaluate the fairness of archive records of live line-ups using a mock-witness procedure and the effectiveness of the present PACE code of practice in producing fair and unbiased line-ups. Also, it seeks to compare the fairness of video identification with the traditional live line-up, and provide data to establish whether the practical benefits of video can also improve the quality of the identification evidence obtained. The records of line-ups and video identifications of actual criminal cases were used. In a perfectly fair line-up the suspect would be chosen, by chance, by 11 percent of the mock witnesses. Twenty-five percent of mock witnesses selected the suspect from 25 photographs of live line-ups, compared to 15 percent of mock witnesses that selected the suspect from video identification. An analysis of covariance was conducted taking the number of visual features mentioned in the original witness’s first description as the covariate. These results showed that the proportion choosing the suspect was significantly smaller from video identification. It was concluded that the video line-ups were fairer than the live line-ups. Wider use of video identifications has the potential to improve the reliability of eyewitness identification evidence. 1 footnote, 2 tables, 19 references, 2 appendices
Main Term(s): England; Line-up
Index Term(s): Eyewitness memory; Facial Recognition/Recall; Interrogation procedures; Interview and interrogation; Suspect identification; Video imaging
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS. Downloaded September 2, 2003.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.