skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 202224 Find in a Library
Title: Victim-Offender Mediation, Making Amends and Restorative Justice in Singapore (From Victims and Criminal Justice: Asian Perspective, P 227-260, 2003, Tatsuya Ota, ed. -- See NCJ-202214)
Author(s): Wing-Cheong Chan
Date Published: 2003
Page Count: 34
Sponsoring Agency: Hogaku-Kenkyu-Kai, Keio University
Tokyo 108-8345, Japan
Sale Source: Hogaku-Kenkyu-Kai, Keio University
2-15-45 Mita, Minato-ku
Tokyo 108-8345,
Type: Legislation/Policy Description
Format: Book (Softbound)
Language: English
Country: Japan
Annotation: This chapter focuses on the ways in which restorative justice concepts, a balanced attention to the needs of both victims and offenders, are being implemented and planned in Singapore, with attention to victim-offender mediation, the compensation order, the community service order, and family conferencing in the juvenile court.
Abstract: The Community Mediation Centres Act was passed by the Singapore Parliament on October 7, 1997, and the first such center was established in January 1998. Its purpose is to give effect to the government's intention to promote mediation as a means of resolving social and community disputes. The act allows the disputing parties to retain control of their dispute through the mediation of a neutral third party. Attendance and participation in a mediation session is voluntary. Matters eligible for referral to mediation are those "concerning a family, social, or community dispute that does not involve a seizable offense under any written law." No dispute can be accepted for mediation except with the consent of the Director of the Community Mediation Centre. Regarding compensation to crime victims, there is no general system of compensation by the state to victims of violent crimes, expect for any person killed while attempting to make an arrest or keep a person in lawful custody. An offender may be ordered by the court to pay compensation on conviction to the victim of the crime. Community service orders have been instituted to enable probationers to make amends for their offenses, not just in service to the general community, but also in service to the victims who have been injured or directly harmed by their offense. Family conferencing has been introduced in the juvenile court to allow the victim, the offender's family, friends, and school teachers to meet in a conference to discuss how to hold the offender accountable and ensure that victim needs are met through restitution and reparation by the offender. The Minister for Home Affairs has community-based sentences will be introduced, including community service orders as a sentencing option on its own and the extension of family conferencing to other than juvenile offenders. 140 notes
Main Term(s): Victim services
Index Term(s): Community service order; Family conferencing; Mediation; Restorative Justice; Singapore; Victim-offender reconciliation; Victims in foreign countries; Victims rights
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.