skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 202297 Find in a Library
Title: Reanalyzing the Prevalence and Social Context of Collateral Consequence Statutes
Journal: Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:31  Issue:5  Dated:September/October 2003  Pages:435-453
Author(s): Kevin G. Buckler; Lawrence F. Travis III
Date Published: September 2003
Page Count: 19
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study replicated earlier research that reported descriptive statistics on State statutes related to the collateral consequences of felony convictions (limitations on rights afforded other citizens) in the 50 States and the District of Columbia.
Abstract: Although technically discharged from incarceration, probation, or parole requirements, a number of U.S. jurisdictions have traditionally and continually imposed collateral consequences on felony offenders after the completion of their sentence. These collateral consequences have traditionally included limitations on the right to vote, hold public office, and sit on a jury; the right of the ex-offender to own a gun; and the right to retain parental rights. Also, many jurisdictions require offenders convicted of certain types of offenses to register with an appropriate governmental agency, and in some jurisdictions a felony conviction is allowed as a ground for divorce. In examining State statutes pertinent to such collateral consequences of felony convictions, this study followed the methodology of previous research undertaken by Burton et al. (1987) and Olivares et al. (1996). In addition to a systematic review of relevant State statutes for the 50 States and the District of Columbia, the study also compared the findings of 2001 statutes with the 1986 and 1996 findings of previous research. In addition to the aforementioned types of restrictions on rights, the study also focused on the denial of welfare benefits to women convicted of State or Federal felony drug charges. The review found that in the years after 1986 there has been a trend toward shifting from the collateral consequences related to political rights (i.e., restriction of voting rights, and the rights to hold public office, sit on a jury, and obtain public employment) to restraints designed to protect the public. These provisions include registration of convicted sex offenders, firearm restrictions, and termination of parental rights. The authors note that this trend has occurred in the context of a major shift in political rhetoric that has been driven primarily by media attention to crime-related issues and a corresponding increase in the public's focus on practical measures designed to increase the public's protection from persons who have previously inflicted severe harm. 2 tables, 6 notes, and 65 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Drug offenders; Ex-offenders; Ex-offenders rights; Parental rights; Sex Offender Registration; State laws; State-by-state analyses; Welfare services
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.