skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 202334 Find in a Library
Title: Victim Vices, Victim Voices, and Impact Statements: On the Place of Emotion and the Role of Restorative Justice in Capital Sentencing
Journal: Crime & Delinquency  Volume:49  Issue:4  Dated:October 2003  Pages:603-626
Author(s): Bruce A. Arrigo; Christopher R. Williams
Date Published: October 2003
Page Count: 24
Publisher: http://www.sagepub.com 
Type: Research (Theoretical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article offers legal and empirical considerations for the use of victim impact statements (VIS) during the penalty phase of capital cases.
Abstract: Victim impact statements are thought of as offering a voice to victims of crime who have been unwilling participants in the process of criminal justice. However, the efficacy and legitimacy of these statements during the penalty phase of capital cases has been questioned. Some argue that the emotional quality of VIS undermines the offender’s chance for a fair and impartial sentence. It has also been argued that such emotionally laden statements undermine a meaningful and restorative justice experience for victims. In order to examine the efficacy and legitimacy of including VIS during the sentencing phase of capital cases, the authors outline the principles of critical restorative justice and explore the legal and empirical limits of VIS. Society’s urge to punish offenders is contrasted to the compassion and forgiveness that are important dimensions of the sentencing process. The authors offer several policy considerations that are consistent with critical restorative justice and that address the need to give voice to victim experiences. Notes, references
Main Term(s): Victim impact statements
Index Term(s): Capital punishment; Restorative Justice; Rights at sentencing; Victim reactions to crime; Victims rights
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=202334

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.