skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 202462 Find in a Library
Title: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys
Journal: Substance Use & Misuse  Volume:38  Issue:10  Dated:2003  Pages:1447-1490
Author(s): Timothy P. Johnson; Phillip J. Bowman
Date Published: 2003
Page Count: 44
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article presents an overview of the cross-cultural quality of survey reports of substance use behaviors in the United States.
Abstract: Empirical studies that have examined one or more facets of substance use reporting across two or more cultural groups in the United States are evaluated. Substance use behaviors associated with tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use are included. The findings suggest that substance misuse researchers and the consumers of their research would be well advised to carefully consider the difficulties involved in cross-cultural survey measurement. These findings are interpreted in terms of alternative theoretical explanations that may be useful in understanding cross-group differentials in measurement error. Cross-group survey estimates would best not be accepted at face value without first considering the quality of the measurement procedures used. Assessments of reliability and validity using one or more of the procedures reviewed earlier would seem to be a minimal requirement for establishing the comparability of survey estimates across cultural groups. A set of strategies and recommendations are included that may prove useful for ensuring the quality of substance use reporting in multicultural surveys. The development of research designs that will permit direct evaluations of the relative utility of the alternative theoretical frameworks discussed is advocated for understanding cultural variability in substance use reporting errors. Future investigations that focus on evaluating potential explanations for differential reporting quality will be contributing to a second generation of cross-cultural research concerned with this topic, one that moves from description to explanation. To understand how culture influences the substance use reporting of survey respondents, culture will need to be “unpackaged.” Researchers should avoid the untested assumption that any relationships between culture and the quality of substance use reporting are linear. Opportunities for improved design of relevant survey measures include consultation and collaboration with cultural insiders and experts, the use of focus groups to better understand the concerns of each cultural group being asked to participate in a research study, the use of best practices for the development of survey questions, and the translation of survey instruments. 3 tables, 106 references
Main Term(s): Cross-cultural analyses; Drug research
Index Term(s): Behavior patterns; Country-by-country analyses; Cross-cultural comparisons; Cultural influences; Research methods; Scientific techniques
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.