skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 202544 Find in a Library
Title: Credibility of Recovered Memory Testimony: Exploring the Effects of Alleged Victim and Perpetrator Gender
Journal: Child Abuse & Neglect  Volume:25  Issue:11  Dated:November 2001  Pages:1415-1426
Author(s): Brian H. Bornstein; Stephanie L. Muller
Date Published: November 2001
Page Count: 12
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the influence of victim/complainant and perpetrator/defendant gender on juror reactions to recovered memory testimony in criminal sexual abuse trials.
Abstract: A total of 244 female college undergraduates participated in this study. The trial summary presented to the participants described a criminal case of child sexual abuse in which the 23-year-old complainant alleged abuse by a parent when the complainant was 10 and 12. The summary described the allegation as "memories of five specific incidents of sexual assault." The parent/defendant denied the allegation. The summary varied three factors among study participants: the complainant's testimony (recovered versus remembered but not previously told), the complainant's gender, and the defendant's gender. Between 27 and 40 participants were exposed to each version of the summary. The memory of the abuse was revealed in the course of the complainant's therapy for depression and bulimia. In the "recovered" testimony condition, memory of the abuse was described as having been repressed and first recovered during therapy. In the "remembered" testimony condition, the abuse was described as having been always remembered but not admitted to anyone until therapy. For each of these conditions, the complainant's and parent/defendant's genders were varied. Findings show that compared to a case in which the memory of the abuse had always been remembered, recovered memory testimony yielded lower perceptions of the defendant's culpability and higher perceptions of the defendant's credibility. In addition, the complainant with recovered memory was viewed as less credible and less likely to be telling the truth. These effects of testimony type were qualified by an interaction with complainant and defendant gender, such that testimony type exerted an effect in cases of alleged heterosexual but not homosexual abuse. These findings suggest that mock jurors' judgments in sexual abuse cases reflect their stereotypes about sexual abuse and expectations regarding the relative likelihood of repression of events in various circumstances. 2 tables, 2 figures, and 29 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile victims
Index Term(s): Adult survivors of child sexual abuse; Child Sexual Abuse; Gender issues; Jury decisionmaking; Jury research; Witness credibility
Note: A portion of this research was presented at the 2000 meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society in New Orleans.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=202544

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.