skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 202834 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Prosecution of Child Abuse: A Meta-Analysis of Rates of Criminal Justice Decisions
Journal: Traum, Violence, & Abuse: A Review Journal  Volume:4  Issue:4  Dated:October 2003  Pages:323-340
Author(s): Theodore P. Cross; Wendy A. Walsh; Monique Simone; Lisa M. Jones
Editor(s): Jon R. Conte
Date Published: October 2003
Page Count: 18
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 1999-JP-FX-1001
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A meta-analysis study was performed on the rates of criminal justice decisions in 21 identified studies of prosecution of child abuse
Abstract: To illuminate the experience of child victims in the criminal justice system, public and professional understanding of the prosecution of child abuse should be based on data, rather than newsworthy cases that may not be representative. Yet, basic data about prosecution of child abuse have not been systematically compiled. However, a number of studies have reported rates for several different decisions related to the prosecution of child abuse cases. This federally funded study analyzed these rates for child abuse cases to address several questions: (1) how often were substantiated or founded cases referred to prosecution; (2) how often were charges filed; (3) how often were cases diverted from prosecution to treatment or other interventions; (4) how often were filed cases carried forward versus diverted or dismissed; (5) how often did child abuse defendants plead guilty versus go to trial; (6) how often were child abuse defendants convicted; and (7) how often were convicted defendants incarcerated? A total of 21 studies of prosecution of child abuse were identified in order to perform a meta-analysis study. Rates were calculated for various decision points in the prosecution of child abuse, and comparison data were gathered from 12 national studies of prosecution in urban areas conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice from 1977 to 1998. Data were aggregated across studies for the following rates: referral to prosecution, charging, diversion, carrying forward, pleading guilty, going to trial, conviction, and incarceration. The data demonstrate that most substantiated and founded child abuse cases do not lead to prosecution but that the majority of cases that are prosecuted do end in conviction, the great majority by guilty plea. The results suggest that using rates to define prosecution success could be misleading. The research is limited by the relatively small number of studies available. Future research was seen in three directions: (1) more research on rates; (2) more could be done meta-analyzing studies of prosecution rates; and (3) research must go beyond rates. In other words, evaluation of prosecution must move beyond prosecution rates and conviction rates. References
Main Term(s): Prosecution
Index Term(s): Child abuse; Child molesters; Conviction rates; Convictions; Judicial diversion; Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP); OJJDP grant-related documents; Plea negotiations; Prosecutorial discretion; Prosecutorial diversion; Prosecutorial screening; Prosecutors
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=202834

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.