skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 203257 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Review of Police Disciplinary Procedures in Maryland and Other States
Author(s): Jeanne E. Bilanin
Corporate Author: University of Maryland
Bureau of Governmental Research
United States of America
Date Published: June 1999
Page Count: 141
Sponsoring Agency: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20740
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

University of Maryland
Bureau of Governmental Research
4511 Knox Road
Suite 201
College Park, MD 20740
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This document discusses how the provisions of Maryland law regarding law enforcement disciplinary procedures have been implemented.
Abstract: Maryland law concerning police disciplinary procedures appears under the subtitle “Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights” (LEOBR) in Article 27, Sections 727 through 734D of the Annotated Code of Maryland. The statute covers two major components of the disciplinary process: (1) the conduct of internal investigations of complaints that may lead to a recommendation of disciplinary action against a police officer; and (2) procedures that must be followed once an investigation results in a recommendation that an officer be disciplined. The study methodology involved a review of the statutes in all 50 States and the District of Columbia and a mail survey of the 117 police agencies in Maryland that were subject to LEOBR. One hundred and six police agencies responded to the survey. The results show that, overall, Maryland’s LEOBR statute compares well to the laws of other States in providing protections to police officers facing the possibility of disciplinary action. Maryland’s statute extends uniform protections to officers in a broad list of local and State police agencies, addresses both investigations and resulting disciplinary actions, contains extensive protections during internal investigations, covers all types of disciplinary actions, and specifies a hearing board composed of sworn officers. Only a few other State statutes contain all these features, and only one statute -- Rhode Island’s -- appears to be more flexible to officers than Maryland’s. The provisions of Maryland’s law that may be viewed as accommodating police officers are offset by provisions that may be viewed as accommodating management: the chief’s selection of all hearing board members and the chief’s authority to overrule the hearing board’s recommendation regarding punishment. The survey of Maryland agencies reveals that the chief’s selection power is often mitigated by collective bargaining agreements or by the policies and procedures of individual agencies, and that the chief’s authority to overrule hearing board recommendations is invoked in only a small percentage of cases. 6 appendices
Main Term(s): Police misconduct; State laws
Index Term(s): Laws and Statutes; Maryland; On-duty offenses; Police reprimands; State government; State regulations; Statutory authority for police services
Note: Downloaded November 29, 2003.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=203257

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.