skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 203308 Find in a Library
Title: Terrorism and Mental Illness: Is There a Relationship?
Journal: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology  Volume:47  Issue:6  Dated:December 2003  Pages:698-713
Author(s): David Weatherston; Jonathan Moran
Date Published: December 2003
Page Count: 16
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: After reviewing current arguments that posit a causal link between mental illness and terrorism, this article counters these arguments based on theoretical reasoning and empirical findings.
Abstract: In writing about "The Political Terrorist," Pearce (1977) claimed that the political terrorist's "behavior may show some evidence of psychopathy, paranoia, or other psychiatric lacunae." He reasons that "This individual may be an aggressive psychopath, who has espoused some particular cause because extremist causes can provide an external focal point for all the things that have gone wrong in his life." In a study of terrorist personality types, Johnson and Feldman (1992) argued that "In a sense, many terrorists may be viewed as people with marginal personalities who are drawn into the group by their own self deficiencies....Personalities with paranoid, antisocial, and sadomasochistic tendencies would also be drawn to the violence fostered by terrorism." In addition, there is often a direct or implied association between pathology and terrorism. In challenging these arguments on a theoretical basis, it can be argued that terrorists are singled out as being mentally ill because they engage in violent acts that are viewed as threatening by established state institutions and actors; however, these same state institutions mount military forces that engage in violence, death, and atrocities against perceived enemies. Such behavior is not deemed to be the product of mental illness. On the empirical level, evidence from life histories and recruitment of various terrorists and terrorist groups have found that although there is no homogeneous psychological pattern, they tend to come from relatively "normal" backgrounds. Social learning, situational group pressure, fervently held ideologies, and other behavioral conditioning apparently explain the behaviors of most terrorists. This article argues, however, that there may be evidence that links the long-term engagement of individuals in terrorist activity with subsequent mental health problems, provided certain factors are present. Certain stressors that occur because of terrorist activity may result in psychological disturbance in certain terrorist. These factors may partially explain the instability of terrorist groups and should be taken into account when detaining and interrogating terrorist suspects. 12 notes and 87 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Mental disorders; Psychological evaluation; Psychological influences on crime; Terrorist profiles
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.